7 Comments
May 12, 2022Liked by Todd Hargrove

I absolutely loved this. I will however have to go back and listen to it at least twice!

Expand full comment

This was awesome!

Expand full comment

Superb, thank you for this. Friston's Free Energy Principle makes so much intuitive sense to me in terms of why and how movement practices like yoga or Feldenkrais are so effective and the conscious updating of beliefs that is happening in mindfulness/insight meditation. I will read the papers now but I would love to hear more about how Mark Miller thinks about open monitoring and non-dual awareness meditation within this predictive processing paradigm (where there is a shift in identity from the small self to an aware self) and also whether he would agree that the dopamine = motivation, serotonin = satiety is too simplistic within this framework. And related to that I would also love to hear more about the level of intensity (either of concentration or movement) required in order to update priors in an adaptive way which seems to differ from person to person. This is such a hopeful line of research for so many conditions - wonderful.

Expand full comment

Hi again Todd. I hope you see this! Am just sharing a link to a short but interesting conversation on The Contemplative Science Podcast in the hope that I could persuade you to have a longer follow up conversation with Mark Miller, maybe jointly with Shamil Chandaria?? 🙏🤞 There is so much interesting and ongoing research on the science of wellbeing and meditation within the active inference framework and I would really love to hear their and your thoughts on improving the predictive environment of the body through movement (perhaps especially attentional movement practices like Feldenkrais or yoga) and what relationship that has to re-constructing a helpful mental model of your world. Another issue I would really like to hear more about, perhaps in conjunction with a trauma specialist, is how we can frame and work with the 'dissolving' aspects of meditative practice (realisation of impermanence, no-self and suffering as predictive error) more therapeutically so as not to minimise the valid felt experience of survivors, assuming we all agree that it isn't helpful to someone who has survived trauma to be told that their suffering is a construction. In other words, as both Mark and Shamil emphasise, it is liberating to understand the absolute nature of reality but we still have to live in the relative world as boundaried beings with a healthy, agentive self and our experiences are real notwithstanding our ability to hold them within a differential contextual container. Thank you and Merry Christmas! Sarra https://open.spotify.com/episode/3SSqB1hi9ZBCuEIsdrWVOh?si=0e5f02d10d7d4d55

Expand full comment

Amazing podcast!

I was wondering, at some point Prof Miller cites an article about subjects reporting high level of MDD being prompted to self-report their feelings at the moment with a beeping sound, and it comes out that they are not really always depressed. I've been looking for this article for days, but can't find it, is it possible to retrieve it somehow?

Thank you!!

Expand full comment